Facebook (7)

QR CODE/MOBILE MARKETING

The music business has been and is undergoing crazy changes that is shaking up all the major and small players in the industry. The problem is not the evolution of a different way of manipulating and consuming media but the failure of the player to foresee and yield to these changes.

 

In studying entrepreneurship last semester, I came across the concept of "creative destruction" which for example had eliminated the elevator man and made extinct the typewriter. On the other hand, the same concept has improved the functionality of the cellular phones and mobile devices, which has become the "now" gadget of the 21st century and beyond. If these devices get smarter, they will start to walk.

 

Before I ramble off topic, I want to implore us not to be like some in the music industry and  ignore the mobile device revolution. Their enhanced functionality/usability has made these devices indispensable to us and their sheer convenience has made them more indispensable to our potential consumer,their new personal companion and 24/7 personal assistant, decision-maker and shopper.

 

As of today, in light of the confusion in the music industry and the advancement in communication technology, it may be wise to adopt the QR code/mobile marketing early. You don't have to be a sorcerer to  see the future as it is coded in black and white.

 

Bob Dylan said it right,"The times, they are a changing." We either embrace it or like the some in the music industry, face exinction, FOREVER.

 

Read more…
Photobucket


According to O'Guin, Allen and Semenik in their book Advertising and Intergrated Brand Promotion, the new world of advertising is full of companies who are looking for new ways to get their brand across to audience and potential consumers. In this seemingly ad cluttered environment, small businesses are caught in the struggle between big corporation on how to make their brand visible and recognizable, send out culturally relevant in a refreshing way and become top-on-the-minds of audience and potential customers. How can new small businesses favorably compete considering the criteria listed above. Let us examine one of ResQ Records brand: The Omogo Reloaded Logo. The Omogo Reloaded logo is good because it is simple, representative and fresh.


Photobucket


Omogo Reloaded brand, Yahoo, Disney and Taco Bell brand all have something in common: Simplicity. When encountered, they are supposed to evoke some sort of feelings in the minds of audience. In comparison, the 4 brands have visual simplicity. These brands employ texts and sometimes an image (as seen in TACO BELL). In the music industry, ResQ Records is a new player with a relatively new genre of music called Afrofusion. The logo just spells the brand out in bold uncomplicated type-face, the smaller font well spaced to hold the weight of the larger ones on top. There are just two colors: Green and black plus the neutral white. The task is to clearly communicate the essence of the music to potential audience and customers and keeping the new logo simple will make recall and association easy for music enthusiasts, potential industry business partners and customers. Simplicity is synonymous to recall and easy recognizability and the Omogo Reloaded brand has that quality.


Photobucket


As Disney appeals to the fun-loving population and Yahoo to the instant messaging internet users, the Omogo Reloaded logo is packed with cultural appeal. The text is set in white background with green on either side. Green-White-Green is the flag of Nigeria, where Afrofusion originates evolving from Afrobeat. According to WorldFlags101.com, " The green stripes represent Nigeria's agriculture industry and its lush vegetation and the white stripe represents the desire for peace and unity within the country". In relation to Afrofusion blend of music, the green and white mean flourishing in harmony. Brand logos do not just represent names, they carry meanings. Here in North America, almost everyone is familiar with the recycle symbol. It is also used as part of the brand.  Representation is what makes the Omogo Reloaded logo better. It is packed with meaning of cultural relevance that an African, American and global audience can relate to.


Photobucket


Notice that the "G" in Omogo has been slightly and intentionally rotated to imitate recycle symbol and the refresh button. This symbol is common on the internet and eye-catching. It represents giving vitality to something that may be worn out. Refreshing, starting afresh and new are the intended messages. At the same time, the rotated "G" also represent ResQ Records consciousness of the diminishing state of the world's resources and our support for the green revolution like encouraging dowloads and reading electronic copies instead of print-outs. The world craves new and refreshing ideas and the Omogo Reloaded brand represents just that. The word, "Reloaded" is implied in the rotated "G" and along the line of brand evolution, all other elements on the logo will be dropped. Like the NIKE swoosh, the slightly tilted G with a arrow head will come to identify Afrofusion music by Omogo Reloaded, percieve as something new/fresh and infigurating.


Photobucket


It's lunch time and you're driving on  highway 33, when you spot a fast food restuarant sign. Almost immediately, you're  feeling hungrier. Result and that's what  an advertisers in that industry desire.


Photobucket


For the Omogo Reloaded brand, the composition is created to stimulate ones imagination by arousing one's curiousity. A look at top ranking national and international brands will reveal their simplicity, their struggle to be very represnetative and relavant in meaning transmission to audience and strive to stay fresh. The Omogo Reloaded brand possesses the above-mentioned qualities, making it very easy to recall. Upon immediate recognition and recollection, certain subtle cultural messages are conjured and a sense of affiliation with the brand is established. It is easy  to support a brand that customers have a connection with. This connection is importnat to the survival of a brand.


Photobucket

Read more…

Silicon Valley:The sad truth about facebook

The people who run Facebook, the social-networking company, are furious about a new movie that takes lots of liberties in its depiction of how Facebook came into existence. They’re upset because much of The Social Network, which opens Oct. 1, is just completely made up. That’s fair enough. But to me, the really interesting thing about this movie is that while much of the tale is invented, the story tells a larger truth about Silicon Valley’s get-rich-quick culture and the kind of people—like Facebook’s 26-year-old founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg—who thrive in this environment..

The Valley used to be a place run by scientists and engineers, people like Robert Noyce, the Ph.D. physicist who helped invent the integrated circuit and cofounded Intel. The Valley, in those days, was focused on hard science and making things. At first there were semiconductors, which is how Silicon Valley got its name; then came computers and software. But now the Valley has become a casino, a place where smart kids arrive hoping to make an easy fortune building companies that seem, if not pointless, at least not as serious as, say, old-guard companies like HP, Intel, Cisco, and Apple.

Facebook lets you keep in touch with your friends; for this profound service to mankind it will generate about $1.5 billion in revenue this year by bombarding its 500 million members with ads. Twitter is a noisy circus of spats and celebrity watching, and its hapless founders still can’t figure out how to make money. That hasn’t stopped venture capitalists from funding dozens of companies that make little apps that work with Twitter, just as they’re also funding countless companies that make apps for Apple’s iPhone, and just as, a few years ago, they were all funding companies that made applications to run on Facebook. Zynga, the biggest of those Facebook app-makers, reportedly will rake in $500 million this year by getting people addicted to cheesy games like Farmville and Mafia Wars, then selling “virtual goods” to use inside the games.

Meanwhile, among some longtime techies, there’s a sense that something important has been lost.

“The old Silicon Valley was about solving really hard problems, making technical bets. But there’s no real technical bet being made with Facebook or Zynga,” says Nathan Myhrvold, the former chief technology officer at Microsoft who now runs an invention lab in Seattle. “Today almost everyone in the Valley will tell you there is too much ‘me-tooism,’ too much looking for a gold rush and not enough people who are looking to solve really hard problems.”

Sure, there are still entrepreneurs and investors chasing serious technology challenges in the Valley. And Myhrvold says he means no disrespect to Facebook and Zynga, which have had clever ideas and are making loads of money.

“What bothers me is the zillions of wannabes who will follow along, and the expectation that every company ought to be focused on doing really short-term, easy things to achieve giant paydays. I think that’s unrealistic, and it’s not healthy,” Myhrvold says.

His company, Intellectual Ventures, intentionally runs counter to the prevailing trend in Silicon Valley. The only problems it tries to solve are ones that seem overwhelmingly difficult. These include creating a new kind of nuclear reactor and developing technologies that could address climate change and eradicate malaria.
Face-to-Facebook Friend Feed: We talk to Facebook users (and self-proclaimed addicts) about how the social networking site fits into their lives

Myhrvold doesn’t have problems raising money. He made a fortune at Microsoft and is a close friend of Bill Gates. But he worries about “the unknown engineers and professors who have good ideas. Are those people going to get funded or will they be talked out of it and told they should do something like Zynga, because virtual goods is where it’s at these days?”

The risk is that by focusing an entire generation of bright young entrepreneurs on such silly things, we’ll fall behind in creating the fundamental building blocks of our economy. The transistor and the integrated circuit gave rise to the last half century of prosperity. But what comes next? “If we distract people with the lure of easy money, with making companies that don’t solve anything hard, we’re going to wind up derailing the thing that has been driving our economy,” Myhrvold says.

We’ve already fallen behind in areas like alternative energy, better batteries, and nanotechnology. Instead of racing to catch up, we’re buying seeds and garden gnomes on Facebook. This won’t end well.

Daniel Lyons is also the author of Options: The Secret Life of Steve Jobs and Dog Days: A Novel.


Read more…
1O 9jabook/ facebook tips for long term thinking individuals
  1. Please let people know what you do. Opportunities come to those who present themselves to receive them. If I see examples of your fantastic art I
    might buy some or recommend you to who will.
  2. Do not write on facebook/9jabook when you are drunk, high or exhausted. (of course I’m not implying you ever get drunk or high so exhausted it isJ)
  3. Consider getting help or at least a second opinion when you decide to create and manage a facebook profile for business.
  4. Your personal profiles and business profiles do affect each other. You shouldn’t be a tattooed Mohawk sporting person in one and a spokesperson
    for nun’s habits in the other. Let’s say Id trust a tattooed Mohawk
    sporting person selling me the kind of clothes they actually wear.
  5. If you don’t feel comfortable having certain people on your friends list then don’t.
  6. Learn to let go. Vicious long running fights on 9jabook/facebook are draining and not a good look.
  7. Expand your real life network. Facebook is global. Enjoy perspectives from all over the world without buying a plane ticket or dreading a visa
    rejection.
  8. Be spontaneous but remember if it’s on the internet its forever.
  9. Relationship updates on highs and lows, quarrels with exes... NO
  10. For those who must share erotic pictures, videos via internet or even phones... DONT. It as good as walking on the streets nude
thanks to enhance academy for this writeup.

BONUS!

  1. Many prospective employers check facebook profiles before the interview. Would you want them to?

Read more…

Connecting with an Ex on Facebook

Facebook clocked half a billion users this past month. I know almost everyone reading this, if not all, has an account on Facebook. Today's debate Tuesday is about connecting with exes on Facebook.

facebook.jpgI joined Facebook several years ago as a Masters student but only recently started actively using it after publishing A Heart to Mend. Before then, I was hidden and I frequently culled my friend’s list for those who I felt were not necessary to be there. I wanted my friends list to remain less than 100, and it remained so.

Now as an Author and to promote my book, A Heart to Mend, I’m back to using the media, and my friends list is over a thousand and growing. I’ve added some of those culled people again, among them so-called toasters, chykers and boyfriends. Having heard some tales from friends, and read some articles, I’m left wondering if I’m making a mistake.

Let me back up a bit. When one gets into a new relationship, the expectation is that both people cut any close ties with their exes. Though some of us choose to remain friends with them, it is physically easier to distance ourselves from exes. What happens is that you start hanging out in new spots with the new love, or you establish a new set of friends. The BB messages, phone calls and emails also reduce drastically with the old flame as time passes and both of you pick up new interests and drift apart.

On the web, it may be a different and difficult ball game altogether especially on Facebook. You have their status update automatically popping up on your newsfeed and the same thing happens when they add new photos. Some of us may even feel like the former girlfriend or boyfriend is taunting us. This is most likely the case when these updates have to do with the ex having found a new person. Imagine seeing that red heart which Facebook uses to denote changes to relationship status. I guess it would irk some people to see their ex hook up with someone else just days or weeks after their break-up while they’re nursing a bruised heart.

So what to do? Some people say they will never add their boyfriends as Facebook friends in the first place, and will remain as single until they’re married. I understand not broadcasting that you’re in a relationship which may end up as transient, but not adding the person as a friend doesn’t really sound realistic. Others say they will remove those friends once they become exes. Sounds more doable, at the same time, you may come across as churlish and bitter and who wants to be the one who is worse off by a break up?

Let’s even talk about people who are in exclusive and defined relationships or now married. A lot of us prefer to be ostriches about past sexual or relationship history. For those who do know, do you insist your partner removes all the exes from their friend list? Or do you encourage your partner to add their exes? I’m one who believes in not burning bridges and have found myself doing the latter. I add old flames and ask Atala to feel free to do the same.

Of course, one part of my mind expects that the reconnections will stay superficial. But what if it doesn’t? What if old embers burst back into flame during the course of a cursory Facebook chat? What if you open the door to the kind of ex that will leave hurtful messages that can be misconstrued by those reading. You know the kind of suggestive insinuations that can even set off the person you’re now with?

What do you think and what would you do?
Read more…

What's Facebook really worth?

What's Facebook really worth? well we know its founder Mark Zuckerberg is worth enough ! (about 4billion dollars)
If the social-media site goes public, it will have to be as forthcoming as many of its users. The prospect of an IPO has investors salivating, but would buying be a good idea?


Is Facebook finally ready to "friend" the stock market?
Speculation about the vast social-networking website going public is nothing new, and, officially, Facebook doesn't have any plans for an IPO. "But Google said the same thing a month before they filed," says Paul Bard, an analyst with Renaissance Capital, which specializes in IPOs.The market for initial public offerings has been heating up, though, and experts say they wouldn't be surprised to see an IPO filing by the world's biggest online clubhouse as soon as September or October. That would put the timing of one of the most anticipated IPOs since the dot-com boom around the end of this year.The temptation: Facebook could raise money to fund expansion while employees and early investors realized their riches by unloading shares.The downside: Facebook would have to reveal juicy details about how much money it makes and how it plans to make more. For as often as Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg preaches publicly about how greater openness makes us better people, his company is notoriously secretive. Facebook rarely shares information such as revenue and profit margins.
The big question: How much is Facebook really worth, anyway?
Valuing the world's biggest social network
The anticipation is understandable. This is a website where hundreds of millions of people go daily to trade photos, catch up with friends and family, and share the trivia of their daily lives. (The details get too trivial for some, but hey, no one makes anyone look.) How can it not make money?
Recent leaks published by Reuters put Facebook's 2009 revenue at $800 million. A shop called Next Up Research believes Facebook brings in about $100 million a month. Based on those numbers and projected rapid growth, Next Up estimates the company is worth $11 billion to $12.5 billion. That's around the same estimate you get if you extrapolate from the value of a stake purchased by Digital Sky Technologies in 2009.
But I think those estimates are way off. Facebook is actually worth at least $30 billion. That's a little bigger than eBay (EBAY, news, msgs) and 50% bigger than Yahoo (YHOO, news, msgs), but just a fifth the size of its closest U.S. competitor, Google (GOOG, news, msgs). Here's my reasoning:
The company most like Facebook is a social-networking site called Tencent, listed on the Hong Kong exchange and based in China (where Facebook is banned). "Tencent is the Facebook of China," says portfolio manager Dennis Wassung of Cabot Money Management, which owns Tencent shares.
That's not the only parallel. Tencent has 428 million users, very roughly the same number as Facebook. (Facebook is expected to announce shortly it has topped 500 million users.)
Tencent has a market cap of $32 billion, and that's about what Facebook should be worth.
True, there are big differences between the two companies. Tencent made most of its $1.8 billion in sales last year from subscription fees and gaming, whereas Facebook earns money primarily from advertising. But my reasoning is that however you extract money using the loyalty of a social-networking site's user base as leverage, the amount of money you can extract -- and how fast that will grow -- should be about the same, because the level of loyalty is the same.
Other valuation methods suggest a similar or higher number:
First, consider the value of private shares of Facebook based on transactions carried out by independent brokers and at SharesPost.com, a platform that connects buyers and sellers in the shares of private companies.

According to Larry Albukerk, who brokers Facebook shares, substantial volume has changed hands recently in the $50-to-$60 range. SharesPost.com has displayed lots of trades in the same range and even above $70, but it's probably better to exclude those trades as outliers, Albukerk says. Because Facebook has about 480 million shares in the private market, he estimates, its value stands around $30 billion.

"There are very large, sophisticated institutional investors who are buying at a $30 billion valuation," Albukerk says. (By the way, if you want to buy Facebook stock in the private market, you're out of luck unless you are an accredited investor. This means you have to have at least $1 million in net worth or income of $200,000 to $300,000, depending on whether you are single or married.)
Analysts at Gordon Brothers Asset Advisors, which specializes in putting values on brands, think Facebook could be worth $40 billion to $60 billion. They get to that estimate by averaging the revenue, profit and enterprise value (market cap minus debt) per user at similar online companies such as Google, Yahoo, AOL (AOL, news, msgs) and eBay, and applying the same multiples to the number of Facebook users.Should you chase the IPO?
Whatever you think Facebook is worth, the fact that estimates of its value are rising sharply confirms that there's a huge appetite for a Facebook IPO. "Over the past several months, the price has been shooting up and up," Albukerk says. "It is a very robust secondary market, more so than any other company in the history of private companies."
This suggests you'll have to be careful about buying Facebook in the open market if it does finally have an IPO -- at a price that wouldn't be set for months. I'm assuming you don't have an account and connections with one of the big Wall Street banks that would help it go public -- the only way you'd get a swing at shares at the IPO price before they traded openly. Baidu (BIDU, news, msgs), known as the Chinese Google, soared "ridiculously high" on its first day of trading, and it took more than 18 months to get back above that initial high, points out Bard, of Renaissance Capital. He expects the same for Facebook.

"This is a stock that major institutions are going to want to own," he says. "The IPO price will be the floor for where it trades. The question is how much does it go up initially."
To avoid getting caught up in the hoopla and paying too much, Bard suggests avoiding Facebook stock if it trades for more than 12 times projected sales for the following 12 months. That, in fact, sounds pretty rich, given that most stocks trade for about two to five times forward sales. But it's an acceptable valuation on a high-growth Internet company, and it's similar to the valuation on Tencent.
As much as Facebook says it does not plan to go public, a securities law could force its hand. By law, when companies have more than 500 shareholders, they are considered to be essentially "public" companies, and regulators make them file financial reports. "So they might as well go public," Albukerk says.
Facebook has declined to comment on how many shareholders it has. "But if they don't have 500, they are darn close," says Albukerk. Facebook has about 1,000 employees, so as many of them leave and look to cash out by selling to investors in the private market, it is "easy to get to 500," he says.
Worth the price?
Does Facebook make enough money to justify the $30 billion valuation that analysts put on it right now?
Rather than profits, the key here is comparing sales. That's a better way to value companies in the early stages of growth, because so much money gets reinvested. Using the benchmark mentioned above -- stock price at 12 times sales -- Facebook would have to make $2.5 billion in revenue next year to justify that price.
That's twice the $1.2 billion annual revenue that Next Up Research estimates currently. But given how many users Facebook has, how much time they spend on the site and how much Facebook knows about them, that looks doable.
On average, according to one estimate, Facebook users spend 23 minutes a day on the site. "People are really shifting to sites like Facebook and Tencent in China. They are really changing the way they are using the Internet," says Wassung, of Cabot Money Management.
Facebook also knows a lot about its members, given that they reveal so much basic personal information -- and their tastes in a variety of areas, through a system that allows them to rate websites, says Anthony Arone of Gordon Brothers Group. Facebook has the exclusive on all of this data, which can be used to target advertising.
"It is like a huge Internet within the Internet that Google doesn't have access to," Albukerk says.
Besides advertising, Facebook hopes to capitalize on the popularity of online games on its site. It has launched its own virtual currency, Facebook Credits, which members use in games such as Farmville. Facebook gets a 30% cut.
And many analysts think Facebook could charge users a fee. A lot of users wouldn't like it, though, and Facebook says it has "absolutely" no plans to do this. But that doesn't rule out fees for premium services.Risks abound
As good as this looks, there are plenty of risks. Above all, there's the privacy issue, a hugely sensitive Internet topic for which Facebook has become a lightning rod.
On the one hand, the company deserves a bad rap. It clearly blundered by rolling out a "Beacon" application that shared user online purchases with all their friends. It has also come under fire for revealing too much other user information to the public.
On the other hand, it's pretty easy to lock down your account.
After several high-profile privacy skirmishes, users remain on alert for any signs of spying; protest pages spring up quickly, right on Facebook, if there's any perceived violation. Recently, rumors circulated that Facebook was sharing personal-contact information with marketers, something the company flatly denies.
"It is a constant battle for them to take advantage of all the data and the close relationship they have with users," says Darren Chervitz of the Jacob Internet Fund (JAMFX).
Another big question is whether Facebook has hit the wall on membership. Nearly two-thirds of all Internet users in the U.S. and Europe already use Facebook, Next Up Research says. That would leave emerging markets for the most growth, and Facebook has had trouble getting traction there. In emerging markets, Facebook is a top-three social-networking site only in India and Brazil, Next Up says.
Finally, there's the well-known fickleness of Internet users. Facebook, after all, has taken the lead from MySpace, which was preceded by Friendster. Facebook does have some protection here in that it has a lower percentage of teen users than other social sites, and they tend to be the most fickle, Next Up says.
But experts have begun to see signs of Facebook fatigue in the growing number of "Facebook suicides," people who close their accounts and walk away. "More people are going to start thinking, 'Who cares that you just had a sandwich or you're sitting at this corner cafe right now?'" predicts Anthony Alfonso of BDO Valuation Advisors. "It was cool at first, but people are starting to say: 'Enough's enough. I'm sick of Facebook. I want to get off.'"
If he's right and Facebook suicides continue, that might one day make anyone who buys Facebook shares expecting huge growth to follow them off the ledge as well.
Michael Brush is the editor of Brush Up on Stocks, an investment newsletter. At the time of publication, he did not own or control shares of any company or fund mentioned in this column.
Read more…
Facebook, for better or worse, is like being at a big party with all your friends, family, acquaintances and co-workers.There are lots of fun, interesting people you're happy to talk to when they stroll up. Then there are the other people, the ones who make you cringe when you see them coming. This article is about those people. Sure, Facebook can be a great tool for keeping up with folks who are important to you. Take the status update, the 160-character message that users post in response to the question, "What's on your mind?" An artful, witty or newsy status update is a pleasure -- a real-time, tiny window into a friend's life. But far more posts read like navel-gazing diary entries, or worse, spam. A recent study categorized 40 percent of Twitter tweets as "pointless babble," and it wouldn't be surprising if updates on Facebook, still a fast-growing social network, break down in a similar way. Take a CNN quiz: What kind of Facebooker are you? » Combine dull status updates with shameless self-promoters, "friend-padders" and that friend of a friend who sends you quizzes every day, and Facebook becomes a daily reminder of why some people can get on your nerves. Watch as Facebookers reveal bugbears » Here are 12 of the most annoying types of Facebook users: The Let-Me-Tell-You-Every-Detail-of-My-Day Bore. "I'm waking up." "I had Wheaties for breakfast." "I'm bored at work." "I'm stuck in traffic." You're kidding! How fascinating! No moment is too mundane for some people to broadcast unsolicited to the world. Just because you have 432 Facebook friends doesn't mean we all want to know when you're waiting for the bus. Don't Miss Facebook buys FriendFeed: Is this a big deal? Twitter blackout left users feeling 'jittery,' 'naked' The Self-Promoter. OK, so we've probably all posted at least once about some achievement. And sure, maybe your friends really do want to read the fascinating article you wrote about beet farming. But when almost EVERY update is a link to your blog, your poetry reading, your 10k results or your art show, you sound like a bragger or a self-centered careerist. The Friend-Padder. The average Facebook user has 120 friends on the site. Schmoozers and social butterflies -- you know, the ones who make lifelong pals on the subway -- might reasonably have 300 or 400. But 1,000 "friends?" Unless you're George Clooney or just won the lottery, no one has that many. That's just showing off. The Town Crier. "Michael Jackson is dead!!!" You heard it from me first! Me, and the 213,000 other people who all saw it on TMZ. These Matt Drudge wannabes are the reason many of us learn of breaking news not from TV or news sites but from online social networks. In their rush to trumpet the news, these people also spread rumors, half-truths and innuendo. No, Jeff Goldblum did not plunge to his death from a New Zealand cliff. The TMIer. "Brad is heading to Walgreens to buy something for these pesky hemorrhoids." Boundaries of privacy and decorum don't seem to exist for these too-much-information updaters, who unabashedly offer up details about their sex lives, marital troubles and bodily functions. Thanks for sharing. The Bad Grammarian. "So sad about Fara Fauset but Im so gladd its friday yippe". Yes, I know the punctuation rules are different in the digital world. And, no, no one likes a spelling-Nazi schoolmarm. But you sound like a moron. The Sympathy-Baiter. "Barbara is feeling sad today." "Man, am I glad that's over." "Jim could really use some good news about now." Like anglers hunting for fish, these sad sacks cast out their hooks -- baited with vague tales of woe -- in the hopes of landing concerned responses. Genuine bad news is one thing, but these manipulative posts are just pleas for attention. The Lurker. The Peeping Toms of Facebook, these voyeurs are too cautious, or maybe too lazy, to update their status or write on your wall. But once in a while, you'll be talking to them and they'll mention something you posted, so you know they're on your page, hiding in the shadows. It's just a little creepy. The Crank. These curmudgeons, like the trolls who spew hate in blog comments, never met something they couldn't complain about. "Carl isn't really that impressed with idiots who don't realize how idiotic they are." [Actual status update.] Keep spreading the love. The Paparazzo. Ever visit your Facebook page and discover that someone's posted a photo of you from last weekend's party -- a photo you didn't authorize and haven't even seen? You'd really rather not have to explain to your mom why you were leering like a drunken hyena and French-kissing a bottle of Jagermeister. The Obscurist. "If not now then when?" "You'll see..." "Grist for the mill." "John is, small world." "Dave thought he was immune, but no. No, he is not." [Actual status updates, all.] Sorry, but you're not being mysterious -- just nonsensical. The Chronic Inviter. "Support my cause. Sign my petition. Play Mafia Wars with me. Which 'Star Trek' character are you? Here are the 'Top 5 cars I have personally owned.' Here are '25 Things About Me.' Here's a drink. What drink are you? We're related! I took the 'What President Are You?' quiz and found out I'm Millard Fillmore! What president are you?" You probably mean well, but stop. Just stop. I don't care what president I am -- can't we simply be friends? Now excuse me while I go post the link to this story on my Facebook page. SO WHICH ONE ARE YOU ON 9jabook.com ! I amj all of the above !
Read more…

Blog Topics by Tags

  • in (506)
  • to (479)
  • of (339)
  • ! (213)
  • as (166)
  • is (157)
  • a (156)

Monthly Archives