Did (9)

12166301091?profile=originalPeople have a funny idea of what Jesus looked like. Jesus of Nazareth was not white-skinned. Jesus was not European. Jesus was a Jew. Jesus lived in the land of Israel, in the Middle East. The Bible tells us that Jesus walked wherever He went, so we can easily imagine that His olive skin would have been darkened by the sun.12166301091?profile=original

Jesus would not have had a neat, trimmed beard, because a command (Leviticus 19:27) in the Law of Moses , which the Bible says Jesus observed, required Jewish males to “not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.”

Hundreds of years after Jesus’ life on earth, Renaissance artists painted pictures that made Jesus look handsome. They were not accurate representations of Jesus’ likeness. The painters were following Italian traditions and the culture of Europe, rather than what the Bible says, and they certainly had never met Jesus. Sadly, their artworks continue to influence thinking to this day.

The only verse in the Bible about Jesus’ physical form, before His death and resurrection, is found in Isaiah 53:2. It says:

“He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to Him,
nothing in His appearance that we should desire Him.”

In other words, the only biblical description of Jesus during His time on earth says that He was not physically attractive.


Beauty, in God’s eyes, comes from within [1 Peter 3:3-4].

On the other hand, in contrast to the horned cartoon character that we are accustomed to seeing, the Bible tells us that the devil is handsome [Ezekiel 28:14-17] and he portrays himself as being full of goodness [2 Corinthians 11:14-15].

The gospel rings true in my heart because it is the opposite of the way man normally thinks.

What man would have conceived a philosophy where salvation would come through believing that God would come to earth as a helpless baby, born in a stinking stable, a peasant among a despised, subjugated people in an obscure land, and would later be nailed up to die like the worst of criminals.

The natural mind is more attracted to youth and beauty, success and acclaim.

But, God’s thoughts are the opposite of man’s thoughts [Isaiah 55:8-9].

Of course, in one sense, it hardly matters what Jesus looked like. It is what He accomplished for us on the cross of Calvary – in paying the price for our sins – that truly counts.

However, it certainly goes to show that there is much to do with Christian belief and living that is influenced more by tradition, and even by the culture and ways of thinking surrounding us, than by what the Bible actually says.

Many Bible truths are confronting. They challenge our normal patterns of thought. However, God, in His perfect wisdom, presents us with Truth – not to tickle our ears but to work for our ultimate good.

Read more…

12166300684?profile=originalThe glamorous lovers’ day celebration on Monday turned bloody at the University of Lagos (UNILAG) when gunmen killed two students. Daily Sun gathered that the clash was between two rival cult groups, namely, Black Axe and the Buccaneers,’ over a female student allegedly snatched by the Capone of the Black Axe for Valentine celebration.

 

The action of the Capone , the source said did not go down well with the other group leading to the clash.
A student who witnessed the shooting said besides the two cult members who were shot dead, about four others sustained injuries and were ferried out of the campus by their leaders to shield their identity.

The sources said the cult members who carried out the attack were not UNILAG students but members from another campus, adding that the attack was carried out in a commando style with sporadic shooting.
An undergraduate student of English Department told Daily Sun that the Buccaneers’ group attacked the Black Axe members while another student returning from the Mosque said those who carried out the killing were not from UNILAG because they did not cover their faces.

It was learnt that as soon the shooting started, students scampered for safety while others took cover behind the wall and under cars packed around, while others ran into the halls to avoid being hit by stray bullets. 
A senior lecturer who confirmed the killings said the university management had met to curtail any reprisal attack while security personnel had taken over the investigation of the deadly cult clash.
When Daily Sun visited the troubled institution yesterday, there was uneasy calm, as most staff and students rebuffed efforts made by the reporters to get their comments.

However, one of the students who resides at Sodeinde Hall, said there was sporadic gunshots outside the premises which caused panic everywhere. 
It was gathered that the crisis, which erupted when the students were at the peak of lovers’ day celebration, created stampede on the campus as people ran for safety.

One of the victims of the attack reportedly ran into Sodeinde Hall for help, from where he was taken to the hospital.
Although the Hall Master of Sodeinde Hall declined comments on the issue, one of the officials, who wouldn’t want his name published, said the attack could not be linked to any cult group. He said there was increasing speculation that the perpetrators of the attack could be fighting for love. Efforts made by Daily Sun our reporter to ascertain the identities of the victims were unsuccessful.
The news bulletin of the university, Information Flash (ISSN 08195540) also captured the incident, while assuring the staff and students of the university of adequate security.

“The attention of the universities authorities has been drawn to the incident which occurred in one of the Halls of Residence in the late hours of Monday, February 14, 2011 where two persons were reportedly injured in fracas. The university management has commenced investigation into the unusual incident, in particular at a time when preparation for the first semester examinations due to commence on February 21, 2011 are in top gear. Security has been intensified to ensure safety of life and property on campus. Law enforcement agents have been involved to assist the university in this respect,” it said. 
Daily Sun learnt that students are leaving the campus because of the fear of reprisal attack while some parents called their wards on phone to return home until the situation is brought under control. 

The Deputy Registrar Information of UNILAG, Mr. Dare Adebisi refused to pick his calls or replied to text message sent to his phone.
When the Lagos Police Public Relations Officer (PPRO), Mr. Samuel Jinadu (DSP) was called thrice, he promised to contact the Divisional Police Officer (DPO) in the area and did not call back as at the press time....

Read more…

jpeg&STREAMOID=RGtuRODGdHcA9HVw1_SHzS6SYeqqxXXqBcOgKOfTXxSGW1EdFPjfQ1T_4bNUhtLZnW_PgxgftuECOcfJwS6Jtlp$r8Fy$6AAZ9zyPuHJ25T7a9GKDSxsGxtpmxP0VAUyHL6IDcZHtmM2t7xO$FHdJG95dFi6y2Uma3vSsvPpVyo-Former

president, Olusegun Obasanjo, for the second time in 2010, yesterday called journalists to his Abeokuta home to fault rumours that he was dead. The rumour had gripped Abeokuta and its environs most of Friday.

Photo: Looking Good in Kaftan on New Year's Eve

Speaking with journalists at his Hilltop Private residence in Abeokuta, Obasanjo who jumped up to show journalists that he is hale and hearty, said, “obviously if I am dead, you won’t see me in flesh and blood. I think people take delight in speculation and rumouring.”

He said it was the seventh time since he became the nation’s president in 1999 and even after he left office in 2007 that he would be confronted with such reports.

Mr. Obasanjo, who said it is only God that determines the right time a person dies, recalled how a friend of his called him Friday morning, breaking to him the news of his rumoured death.

“He said he was trying to confirm and that he had counted seven times that l have been rumoured dead since the eve of my inauguration in 1999 as a democratically elected President of Nigeria till today,” Mr. Obasanjo said.

The former president said those who indulge in this will not give up “and those who are superstitious believe that when there are rumours and speculation like this means longevity. Whether longevity or not, what I know is that until the Good Lord who has created me decide to say yes, I have reached my take off point to return to him, people may speculate, people may rumour and that will be their own handicap.

“My words to Nigerians are that wishes are not horses. People’s wishes do not make it to happen. But I know that anybody created is bound to die sometimes. When my time comes, it will not be man that will decide. It is in the hands of God,” he added.

On the controversy over whether he slumped at a ceremony in Ondo State, he said:

“I did not slump, but when I was choked in the church because of lack of air conditioner and fan, I went to my car which had an AC and after staying there for about three minutes, I felt okay and I decided to go to my host house because I have not taken my breakfast. There, I was given two pieces of banana which I ate and I returned to the church. I was shocked three days after reading that I slumped. It is part of the gimmick of selling newspapers.”

Mr. Obasanjo said Nigerians should be thankful for the year ending 2010, adding that the new year promises to be a year of high expectations and divine year for sustenance of unity for all Nigerians

“We all Nigerians should be thankful for the year ending, 2010. I wish all Nigerians, young and old, male and female, every good fortune the year 2011 offers and promise to be a year of high expectations for all Nigerians,” he said.

Read more…
Was favoured singer, D'banj truly beaten blue black by rapper, Ikechukwu Onunaku? This is the question music lovers and fans of the artistes are asking. They should know, however, that the veracity or otherwise of this allegation is akin to the archetype fart in a masquerade garb that must be borne by its bearer, no matter how putrid and pungent.



Some are postulating that if indeed Ikechukwu did not beat up D'banj, what led to his sudden ouster from Mo'Hits with whose members he hitherto enjoyed a cordial relationship?

Since his days as a Storm Records ensign, the 36-year-old rapper had always been a constant fixture in all Mo'Hits musical and social endeavours. When he officially disengaged from Storm, it was assumed that Mo'Hits, helmed by Don Jazzy and D'banj, would be his next label.

This assumption gained grounds when the braggadocious lyricist and founder of World Famous Academy featured the duo in a couple of his songs especially Wind Am Well in his last album. Even his current rave song, Critical, has the lyrical imprimatur of D'banj and the production aplomb of Don Jazzy. So, what went wrong between the two parties? Neither party was ready to go into details but there are undertones of girl-friend snatching among other details.

However, sources close to the label say the issue is far more fundamental and profound than that. Issues got to a head recently when the wave-making label denied that Ikechukwu was their artiste, affirming that he was only a friend of the house. And that set the rumour mill in auto drive.

E-Punch sources disclosed that indeed there was a face-off between the rapper and D'banj but it did not degenerate into fisticuffs...

It could not have because sinewy Ikechukwu is a black belt holder in karate with further expertise in Shotokan, aikido and tai chi. In fact, Ikechukwu was quoted as saying that the closest he got to being physical with his former collaborator was when he used to take him in karate lessons.

With a tone of finality, he says, "Ok, all you rumour mongers, false prophets and bearers of fake gist, I'm gonna say this once, I did not beat up D'Banj, case closed." Even Don Jazzy who is typically taciturn on such matters denied the allegation, saying it could never have happened.
Read more…
PH2010091102326.jpgNEW YORK: A US pastor, who had threatened to burn Quran, on Saturday said he never burn copies of the holy book, even if a mosque is built near ground zero in this America's commercial capital.

"We will definitely not burn the Quran, no," Pastor Terry Jones of Florida told NBC.

"Not today, not ever," he said when pressed whether his planned demonstration might happen at a later date.

He explained that it would not happen even if the Islamic center is built near ground zero, NBC reported.

"Even though we have not burned one Quran, we have gotten over 100 death threats," Jones said.

"We feel that God is telling us to stop, and we also hope that ... maybe that will open up the door to maybe be able to talk to the imam."

Jones had on Friday suspended his plans to burn copies of the Quran claiming that he received a pledge from a Florida Imam that the Islamic cultural center would be moved elsewhere.

However, the Imam refuted his claim and said the "deal" existed only in Jone's mind.

The pastor's threat to burn copies of the holy Quran had stirred outrage in Islamic world, with kings and presidents of Muslim nations joining hands to condemn his plans and asking US President Barack Obama to intervene to stop it.

Obama, on his part, said, the pastor's move could lead to "recruitment bonanza for al-Qaida."

In his Eid greetings, Obama said this year's Eid is also an occasion to reflect on the importance of religious tolerance and to recognise the positive role that religious communities of all faiths, including Muslims, have played in American life.

Non-Muslim nations have also condemned the pastor's plans. .


Read more…



The scientist has claimed that no divine force was needed to explain why the Universe was formed..

In his latest book, The Grand Design, an extract of which is published in Eureka magazine in The Times, Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.”


He added: “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”

In A Brief History of Time, Prof Hawking's most famous work, he did not dismiss the possibility that God had a hand in the creation of the world..

He wrote in the 1988 book: "If we discover a complete theory, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason — for then we should know the mind of God.”

In his new book he rejects Sir Isaac Newton's theory that the Universe did not spontaneously begin to form but was set in motion by God.

In June this year Prof Hawking told a Channel 4 series that he didn't believe that a "personal" God existed. He told Genius of Britain: "The question is: is the way the universe began chosen by God for reasons we can't understand, or was it determined by a law of science? I believe the second. If you like, you can call the laws of science 'God', but it wouldn't be a personal God that you could meet, and ask questions."

Until his retirement last year Prof Hawking was Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge, a post previously held by Newton.

The book, co-written by American physicist Leonard Mlodinow, is published on September 9.

Read more…
Question: DID YOU KNOW WOLE SOYINKA's Daughter works in the Presidency ? Since OBJs Tenure until NOW !

Well Read On

Ejusdem Generis is Latin for "of the same kind," used to interpret loosely written statutes. Where a

law lists specific classes of persons or things and then refers to them in general, the general

statements only apply to the same kind of persons or things specifically listed. Example: if a law refers

to automobiles, trucks, tractors, motorcycles and other motor-powered vehicles, "vehicles" would not

include airplanes, since the list was of land-based transportation.

Our interpretation for Ejusdem Generis

if a law refers to Nigerian Leaders who have been Soldiers, Politicians, and other corruption-powered

People, "People" would not include writers (wole soyinka), since the list was of Presidential-based

leaders.



Lagos—political calculations and/or miscalculations could solidify certain sainthood, definitely, it is

possible, it could diminish it. Furthermore, alleged Sainthood could come crumpling, turn to dust,

albatross, because man is just ordinary mortal despite alleged provocation at lunacy of actionable

journalistic responsibilities.

It is definitely, colossally disparaging that “Our Dear” respectable enough Noble Laureate is struggling

today to get away from “his friend IBB”—it must be tough on him despite his “pretended ignorance” at

Remi Oyeyemi’s article, ignorance of RepublicReport’s publications, ignorance of other institutional

publications in print and electronically by Nigeria Media out-lets, who got frustrated by Soyinka’s

unending romance with “Evil Genius” Ibrahim B. Babangida. This dubious romance dated back to 80s &

90s,when IBB appointed Soyinka—Chairman Federal Road Safety Commission [FRSC], an appointment

that “triggered” massive recruitment of Sea-Dog secrete Cult-Members to become Road Marshals to

protect the citizenry by the eminent professor, reports say.

Obviously this is followed by numerous visits to Aso-Rock of any administration in power [military or

civilian].

Nobel Laureate Soyinka admitted visited former President Obasanjo administration Headquartered in

Abuja, [1999-2007] many times.

Reporters observed that it was unusual for Soyinka to visit a sitting President in Aso Rock:

In response, the Nobel Laureate disclosed that he used to visit former President, Olusegun Obasanjo

in the Presidential Villa until he became disappointed in the retired General.

“Well, you know, people tend to forget that presidents are human beings, first of all, and they have

relationships. I used to visit Obasanjo, at least when I thought there was something in him to benefit

the nation. When I found there is nothing, I stopped. So it is not unusual for me to visit presidents,”

he said.

Wole Soyinka’s daughter was appointed Special Assistant to the presidency by Obasanjo

administration. She still serves in that capacity today under the present presidency. Obasanjo later

impregnated her according to News of the People’s Magazine, “Obasanjo impregnates Wole Soyinka’s

daughter, Mrs. Onijala, married to Mr. John Olutola Onijala, a Nigerian diplomat; breaks the marriage,

and husband seeks divorce.” People Magazine, February 12, 2008.

Some reports accused Wole Soyinka of, “Following the Money” all the time.

“Wole Soyinka we knew and read about yesterday is not the same Wole Soyinka that we know and

read about today, something is definitely a-mix from my crystal ball” one commentator added.

Despite major national, regional and international difficulties and challenges that we face, we are

encumbered with ‘op-ed’ rejoinder by Soyinka sweating and defending the indefensible such as, “Edo-

Rally & Tea Summit with IBB” under the invitation of Governor Oshomole’s “One-Man One Vote”

political symphonies at Edo-State-house. Who could have believed any iota of Wole Soyinka’s partial

admittance of fundamental elements of truisms of IBB’s interview two-weeks ago published in

Nigerian-Compass, RepublicRpeort, and now Remi Oyeyemi at SR?

“However, Ibrahim Babangida, in the account offered by Oyeyemi, was absolutely correct in one

aspect. I have no personal problem with him or with any other individual to whom I openly identify as

a political adversary. Babangida does however have a huge problem of political deficit with me, and

with the nation, and that is the albatross that constitutes his problem. I affirm that, if the State

House stewards had offered me tea with IBB, I would have declined, but it would only have been to

request something a little stronger, since I am no tea drinker. I am happy to note that Oyeyemi’s

strictures do not extend to having a drink with anyone on the other side of a profound political divide”

Professor Soyinka. How come it took you over two-weeks to react to troubling allegations until friend

sent you the link?

“Whose truth is this? Obviously Oyeyemi’s, not that of anyone else who was present in Oshiomole’s

visitors’ lounge, the airport, the Ikeja arrival lounge, or listened to my brief statement with the media

at Ikeja. Since when did the Oyeyemi of the world appropriate the right to interpret events at which

they were not present, and assign a ‘truth’ to the state of mind of the characters involved. What are

the credentials of Oyeyemi as a mind-reader? Has he spoken to Oshiomole? To his staff who organized

the event? To the team which whisked me to the airport? To Akande, Tinubu, Fayemi etc etc to whom

I spoke while organising my exit from Oshiomole’s guest house? Is any of that melodrama of any real

interest to busy and serious-minded people? Who is this faceless individual to compose his own

spurious scenario in his feverish mind and attempt to foist it on your readership?” Soyinka

Take it easy eminent professor—it is really tough on you these days—we indeed live in an interesting

time. Our eminent Professor of literature is asking Remi Oyeyemi to explain “earthshaking details of

this tea session:” “Was it milk, cream, sugar, biscuits on the side?” were served by Edo State house

stewards.

“Did Babangida really say we had tea together? I am learning of this weird claim for the first time. So

what should I do? Sue him for defamation? Oyeyemi owes it to his readers to unravel the earth-

shaking details of this tea session. Was it with milk? Cream? Sugar? Biscuits on the side? After all,

Oshiomole’s visitors’ lounge was constantly filled, from the beginning to the end. Someone must have

noticed some sinister details. The stewards must remember whom they served tea, and in whose

company. Oyeyemi should do his homework. Obviously these are weighty matters on which the future

of the nation depends” Wole Soyinka.

This is too mundane a defeatist expletives coming from our eminent professor of literature.

Authoritative source said, “Some virtual-truisms are disturbingly and holistically missing in these

dialogues, definitely disappointing his colleagues’ sensibilities at current prevailing intellectual culture”

that is bedevilled by intellectual fraud, however.

“Please, spare yourself and us the likes of those who throw around words like ‘truth’ and ‘integrity’

until they have learnt to respect their adjunct – ‘responsibility’” Wole Soyinka.

Evidently someone is not telling the whole truth about these exchanges of “editorial responsibilities”

—but what one thing is clinically clear in this dialogueis:—Professor of literature Wole Soyinka is

struggling to-get-away from IBB, because of their past political and secrete-cult-affinities—obviously,

it’s TOUGH on Nobel Laureate, “Tea Break In Naija” Rejoinder, notwithstanding.

Read full Wole Soyinka Rejoinder communication to Remi Oyeyemi’s article below:

Tea Break In Naija, Written By Wole Soyinka

While this intervention has been triggered off by an ‘op-ed’ in your online journal by one Remi

Oyeyemi, I have to let you know that I have taken the trouble to respond more out of a concern for the

editorial responsibilities of your journal than anything else. This is not the first such abuse of

SAHARAREPORTERS and, curiously enough, a former occasion had to do with the same subject

I.B.Babangida. I shall begin by acknowledging the extreme generosity of your contributor in allowing

me one full week of grace to respond to an interview I had never seen, nor knew anything about. In

his article, the sanctimonious Oyeyemi has again graciously imposed a deadline, albeit unspecified. I

shudder to think what would have happened if a concerned reader had not sent me a link, wondering

what this was all about. Virtual decapitation?

Now, to some pertinent issues: I remain in ignorance also of how the Nigerian media reported the Edo

incident. Beyond my brief comment on return to Ikeja airport, I declined to give any interviews on the

incident. I left the airport before the AC delegation. By agreement en route from Benin, they would do

the talking. My only interest was to return to my US engagements without further loss of valuable

time.

There is a deplorable tone of pomposity, of dictatorial conceit in Oyeyemi’s article that sets one’s

teeth on edge. Here is an article premised on a profusion of ‘ifs’, ‘maybes’, ‘mightbes’, ‘it is possible

that’, ‘alleged’, ‘reportedly’, yet filled with conclusive judgmental expressions and smug

censoriousness. Setting up oneself as a judge of political moralities requires a more rigorous approach

to the marshaling, and presentation of suppositions and facts. You do not impute a ‘cover-up’ on such

feeble, convenient, purely speculative terms – and over such trivia!

A surprise encounter, totally unexpected that took place in the presence of, and involving at least

thirty others in the reception room of a state governor is not, by any stretch of imagination, an

encounter to be tendentiously described as taking place ‘behind closed doors’. This was in the ‘public

domain’, and it is presumptuous for anyone to require that I give an account, as a public duty, to what

was clear to everyone in that formal and open space as a fortuitous encounter, and one with all

conversation audible to all, including a swarm of reporters and photographers that accompanied

Babangida into that lounge.

However, Ibrahim Babangida, in the account offered by Oyeyemi, was absolutely correct in one aspect.

I have no personal problem with him or with any other individual to whom I openly identify as a

political adversary. Babangida does however have a huge problem of political deficit with me, and with

the nation, and that is the albatross that constitutes his problem. I affirm that, if the State House

stewards had offered me tea with IBB, I would have declined, but it would only have been to request

something a little stronger, since I am no tea drinker. I am happy to note that Oyeyemi’s strictures do

not extend to having a drink with anyone on the other side of a profound political divide.

The purists of political contact are welcome to their position, but they should learn to mind their

language. ’Behind closed doors’! Is there no longer any respect for truth?

As already stated, I indeed met and exchanged ‘pleasantries’ with Babangida. When I discovered what

had brought him into Oshiomole’s visitors’ lounge – in company of at least some twenty-odd other

guests, including Governor Sylvia of Bayelsa – when I found that he had been invited to the rally, and

that David Mark was also invited as Guest of Honour, I organized my leave-taking as fusslessly and

efficiently as I know how, with a fortuitous timing that enabled me to hitch a ride in the chartered

plane that brought AC leaders to Edo. I especially did not want to embarrass my host, Adam

Oshiomole, who – I still feel – had invited me with less than expected candour and error of judgment.

I find Oyeyemi’s article pretentious, pompous and irresponsibly misleading. SAHARA REPORTERS could

have punctured this soufflé by contacting me and drawing my attention to Babangida’s interview. They

know how to find me. Other media have taken similar action in the past, sometimes only to decide not

even to publish my response when they judged that the issue merited no more than transient curiosity

– in journalese, considered unnewsworthy.

“But he owes the rest of us the TRUTH (my emphasis) that this was what transpired, and that he

changed his mind after having tea with him (IBB) that he did not want to be seen in public with him.

Misleading (?) the public that he turned back from Benin airport when this was not what happened…”

writes Mr. Remi Oyeyemi.

Whose truth is this? Obviously Oyeyemi’s, not that of anyone else who was present in Oshiomole’s

visitors’ lounge, the airport, the Ikeja arrival lounge, or listened to my brief statement with the media

at Ikeja. Since when did the Oyeyemi of the world appropriate the right to interpret events at which

they were not present, and assign a ‘truth’ to the state of mind of the characters involved. What are

the credentials of Oyeyemi as a mind-reader? Has he spoken to Oshiomole? To his staff who organized

the event? To the team which whisked me to the airport? To Akande, Tinubu, Fayemi etc etc to whom

I spoke while organising my exit from Oshiomole’s guest house? Is any of that melodrama of any real

interest to busy and serious-minded people? Who is this faceless individual to compose his own

spurious scenario in his feverish mind and attempt to foist it on your readership?

Tea is beginning to assume mythological proportions in Nigerian affairs – sadly and tragically, from

Tam David-West to Moshood Abiola. Perhaps this is responsible for the fictive ‘tea-party’ of Oyeyemi’s

imagination. If the fact that my arrival in Ikeja in an aircraft with AC leaders confused the press

awaiting the retreat, that element, that ‘weighty atom’ of tea leaves – even if it were real – is so

disproportionate to the main issue, which is that we all declined to participate in that rally, that I

cannot find the energy to pillory the media on its account. What remains is not even a storm, but

mere froth in a phantom teacup.

Did Babangida really say we had tea together? I am learning of this weird claim for the first time. So

what should I do? Sue him for defamation? Oyeyemi owes it to his readers to unravel the earth-

shaking details of this tea session. Was it with milk? Cream? Sugar? Biscuits on the side? After all,

Oshiomole’s visitors’ lounge was constantly filled, from the beginning to the end. Someone must have

noticed some sinister details. The stewards must remember whom they served tea, and in whose

company. Oyeyemi should do his homework. Obviously these are weighty matters on which the future

of the nation depends.

Please, spare yourself and us the likes of those who throw around words like ‘truth’ and ‘integrity’ until

they have learnt to respect their adjunct – ‘responsibility’.

Wole Soyinka

Wole Soyinka, Nigerian Media And The Edo Rally

To assume that our icon and respected professor of English Literature, Professor Wole Soyinka is

adjudged a “Saint” by many in Nigeria and the world would probably be a correct assumption. There is

nothing wrong in this because as we all know, the pantheon of saints is filled with men and women

who were once ordinary mortals. Given the length and substance of contributions of the revered

Professor to struggles for social and civil development in Nigeria and his constant quest for a fair

political system for the country, it is one’s candid opinion that he deserves his sainthood. When a

human being reaches the pedestal of sainthood, he is no longer a private property. He is like a comet.

He draws attention wherever he goes and wherever he shows up. He becomes the barometer with

which others are measured. He becomes the standard to which many aspire. He becomes the property

of all those who adore him and those who worship at his feet. He becomes a public figure whose all

acts and utterances would elicit more than ordinary interest and scrutiny. He is passionately admired

and reverently regarded. In the eyes of his devotees, he could hardly do any wrong. As a result of this,

much would always be conceded to him while much more would continue to be expected of him.

Responding to a “saint” who has many non-questioning admirers, is a difficult task because such a

venture is fraught with danger- yes, the danger of being misunderstood. But as Professor Soyinka

himself would testify as a proud son of Oodua, in Yorubaland we respect our elders very tremendously,

but we are never afraid to ask them questions and hold them accountable. Thus, in this follow up that

would be my final commentary on this issue regardless of what serves as its concomitants I would

maintain the respect I have for the revered Kongi in full.

I am sure that the Professor would be disappointed if I fail to respond having suggested in his “TEA

BREAK IN NAIJA,” that Remi Oyeyemi is “irresponsible.” He claimed that I, REMI OYEYEMI am “a

faceless individual.” WOW!! This is an incredible claim by a Professor known for his intellectual

prowess and diligence. After reading his piece, my first inkling was to let the matter rest. But it is

difficult to let the highly esteemed Professor get away with the less than classy act of calling this

writer “irresponsible” and a “faceless individual.”

It is amazing that this eminent Professor who accused me of not doing my “home work” is actually the

one who failed to do his home work. In his response to my initial piece, he implied that he has many

friends in the media who have decided against using some stories or articles about him (Soyinka) that

they deemed unworthy in the past. If he had bothered to ask around the same media circles that he

boasted about, at least one or two people would have told him that REMI OYEYEMI is not “faceless.”

Going beyond that he could have picked up his phone to speak to some of the political personalities

that he mentioned were on the plane with him on his escape from Benin to Lagos, and some of them

would have told him who REMI OYEYEMI is.

Professor Soyinka used the word “abuse” to describe the publication of my article by

SAHARAREPORTERS. In my book the use of this word is in itself an “abuse” by my dear Professor.

Needless to say that SAHARAREPORTERS is an unbiased medium that has often allowed the

publication of all sides of an issue. To use such words to describe the medium’s act of publishing my

article is a misuse of the word “abuse”. It is a serious challenge to have to say this about the

distinguished Egba Englishman famous for his seminal command of grammar and dexterous aptitude

for the use of diction.

The Professor suggested that SAHARAREPORTERS ought to have reached out to him and ask him about

the details of what was in my article, most of which have been in the public domain except the

questions that I raised. Wole Soyinka is advocating censorship? This is stranger than fiction! I am

flabbergasted about this because I know how the Professor has always condemned censorship in the

Nigerian society when some of our media houses were closed down especially during the era of the

deadly duo of Generals Mohammadu Buhari and Tunde Idiagbon. What could have changed in the years

gone by to get him to wantonly exhibit the same attitude that he called “dictatorial conceit” in

describing my article? Is this a case of “pot calling the kettle black” when Professor Soyinka accused

me of “deplorable tone of pomposity ……. that sets one’s teeth on edge.”
Before we move one, for purposes of clarity, it is important that the following “pertinent issues” as

Professor Soyinka called them in his response are noted by the readers:

a. Did Professor Wole Soyinka get to Oshiomole’s House in Benin or not?
b. If he did, why was the Media led to believe that he turned back at the Benin Airport?

c. Why was it not reported in the Media that he met with IBB in Oshiomole’s Home before deciding

not to attend the rally?

d. Why must Kongi wait until IBB’s controversial interview before telling the public that he actually

met with IBB whom he wishes the world to believe he is not supporting, in Benin as he admitted in his

response to Remi Oyeyemi?

e. Why did Kongi have to wait for Remi Oyeyemi’s article and about 54 days after the fact to now

suggest to the public (in Tea Break in Naija) that the Media reports of his visit to Edo State were not

very accurate?
Professor Soyinka wrote the following:

“…..I remain in ignorance also of how the Nigerian media reported the Edo incident. Beyond my brief

comment on return to Ikeja airport, I declined to give any interviews on the incident. I left the airport

before the AC delegation. By agreement en route from Benin, they would do the talking. My only

interest was to return to my US engagements without further loss of valuable time.”

The reports of what allegedly transpired in Edo State came out in all the national dailies on April 30,

2010. The Ibrahim Babangida’s interview came out 44 days after on June 13, 2010 in the COMPASS

Newspaper. My article which was a reaction to IBB’s interview was actually submitted within 30

minutes of its completion on June 20,2010. If the media had misreported what transpired in Edo State

in regard to Professor Soyinka as he implied in the quote above by claiming to be ignorant of “how the

Nigerian media reported the incident,” the esteemed Professor had 44 days to set the record straight,

before IBB had the chance to open the can of tea. But Professor Soyinka did not do so for reasons best

known to him.

Since he also admitted in the quote above that “By agreement en route from Benin, they (the AC

delegation) would do the talking,” where then is the fault of Remi Oyeyemi if Professor Soyinka’s

friends gave less than complete version of events to the Nigerian media? It is assumed that before the

Professor would agree that these friends of his (the AC delegation) should do the talking, he must

have had a modicum of trust in them and believed that they would do a good job of it. If Professor

Soyinka believed that the Nigerian Media did not do a good job reporting the events that occurred in

Edo State, where was he in the previous 44 days before the IBB interview? And what is wrong if Remi

Oyeyemi seeks clarification about the confusing reports?
Professor Soyinka was upset that my “article premised on a profusion of ‘ifs’, ‘maybes’, ‘might bes’, ‘it

is possible that’, ‘alleged’, ‘reportedly’.” It is surprising that my highly esteemed Kongi did not know

that the reason for that was because I, as a public commentator and admirer, was giving him benefit

of the doubt which I believe he richly deserved. I wanted him to come out and clear the air about the

insinuations that IBB was making in his interview. He has done that, but he was greatly mistaken by

trying to blame Remi Oyeyemi for omissions that are patently Wole Soyinka’s.

Then Professor Soyinka made the following confession:

“…..I indeed met and exchanged ‘pleasantries’ with Babangida. When I discovered what had brought

him into Oshiomole’s visitors’ lounge – in company of at least some twenty-odd other guests,

including Governor Sylvia of Bayelsa – when I found that he had been invited to the rally, and that

David Mark was also invited as Guest of Honour, I organized my leave-taking as fusslessly and

efficiently as I know how, with a fortuitous timing that enabled me to hitch a ride in the chartered

plane that brought AC leaders to Edo.”

Professor Soyinka needed to have gone beyond this mere confession to show Remi Oyeyemi’s

“irresponsibility.” Where in all the MEDIA REPORTS was it reported that the Professor “indeed met and

exchanged ‘pleasantries’ with Babangida?” It meant that if IBB, who probably have a different motive

for the revelation of that happenstance, did not reveal such in his COMPASS interview, the world would

have been made to believe that our revered Professor turned back from the Benin Airport? Doesn’t the

Professor know that it is better that the world be made aware of what happened as soon as it

happened rather than let it filter out? Does he not know that it would look “somehow” if this is heard

third hand? Does he not see the ramification for his credibility in this context? Does he think this

would be an issue if he had made the happenstance public before now rather than allow his friend IBB

do this?

With due respect, after Professor Soyinka made the above quoted confession that he actually met IBB

and exchanged pleasantries with him, it is highly preposterous, for the highly esteemed Professor to

contend that he finds “Oyeyemi’s article pretentious, pompous and irresponsibly misleading.” How is

Remi Oyeyemi’s article “misleading?” Have you not just confirmed and confessed to exchanging

“pleasantries” (whatever that means) with IBB? What is “pretentious” about Remi Oyeyemi’s article

when he (Oyeyemi) insisted that there was nothing wrong if you chose to drink tea with IBB and still

not support him, but just make that clear to the observing public so that your actions were not

misinterpreted? It is inaccurate to describe Oyeyemi’s article as “pompous” when all he was trying to

do is to get clarification to an obvious obfuscation, except that our esteemed Professor thinks he

ought not be questioned about his acts and utterances when such are unclear?

If this were to be the case it would be very unfortunate. Apart from the fact that it is against our

culture in Yorubaland to shut up a younger person who has a legitimate concern, Professor Soyinka has

put in about five decades of fight to creating a society where no one would be above the law and

everyone could be held accountable for their choices and actions. To try and suggest now that he has

to be an exception to this rule is rather baffling and confusing. Even the Great Obafemi Awolowo was

not immune from constructive criticism from both friends and detractors alike. So, why is Wole Soyinka

an exception?

In his “Tea Break in Naija,” Professor Wole Soyinka jabbed adroitly like Joe Frazier, pummelled nimbly

like George Foreman and deftly danced around like Mohammad Ali as he employed his arsenal of

diction to challenge the credibility and pertinence of my article. But dexterity at the usage of grammar

and adept application of Lexis and Structure to convey an abstract idea in a mechanically accurate way

does not necessarily equate unassailable facts. Some of the facts are as follows:

a. That it is true that Professor Wole Soyinka met IBB in Oshiomole’s house in Benin;

b. That Professor Wole Soyinka did not turn back from Benin Airport to return to Lagos as claimed in

the media;

c. That Professor Wole Soyinka contracted the Press Briefings on the Benin Saga to his political

friends some of whom I also happen to know;

d. That Professor Soyinka has a duty to check the media reports of the Benin Saga and ensure that

he was not misrepresented, but he chose not to do so;

e. That the ignorance claimed by Professor Soyinka about “how the Nigerian media reported the Edo

incident,” seemed a second thought and appeared to be a ploy to absolve himself of responsibility

about the inaccurate media reports (as he now suggests) on the Edo incident;

f. That Professor Wole Soyinka did not shun the Benin rally because of Babangida as the media and

the rest of us were made to believe but because of David Mark and he (Soyinka) confirmed this in his

article responding to Remi Oyeyemi;

g. That Remi Oyeyemi is not “irresponsible” as claimed by Professor Wole Soyinka in his article “TEA

BREAK IN NAIJA” for asking the germane questions that clarified these issues.
Professor Soyinka wrote inter alia:

“However, Ibrahim Babangida, in the account offered by Oyeyemi, was absolutely correct in one

aspect. I have no personal problem with him or with any other individual to whom I openly identify as

a political adversary. “ (emphasis mine)

This is very incorrect. Presently, I am not a reporter, just an op-ed contributor or public commentator. I

was not reporting from Edo State. The account referred to is not my account. It is IBB’s account of

events as reported in the interview granted to COMPASS Newspaper. It is amazing that Professor

Soyinka would falsely attribute this to me to make a case of “irresponsibility” when it was clear that

this was quoted as coming from COMPASS in my previous article. However, Professor Soyinka does not

have to be defensive about his relationship with IBB, more so they have worked together before. All of

us have the right to change our views or opinions about events and personalities.

Thus when Professor Soyinka added, “Babangida does however have a huge problem of political deficit

with me, and with the nation, and that is the albatross that constitutes his problem,” he was just

addressing the heart of the matter. This is the reason why dalliance with IBB should not be shrouded

in a cocoon of secrecy so that others might not misinterpret and have unnecessary suspicions. It is

also begging the question that Professor Soyinka would suggest that it was wrong for his choices and

actions to be scrutinized by members of the public like Remi Oyeyemi when in fact he is not just a

public figure he is also a celebrity adored by many and taken seriously by not just a few.

My highly esteemed Kongi also wrote as follows:

“Did Babangida really say we had tea together? I am learning of this weird claim for the first time. So

what should I do? Sue him for defamation? Oyeyemi owes it to his readers to unravel the earth-

shaking details of this tea session. Was it with milk? Cream? Sugar? Biscuits on the side?”

Sincerely speaking, I did not expect Professor Soyinka to be unduly ridiculous as he manifested in the

above quote. With due respects to the esteemed Professor, the questions in the above quote sound a

little languid as far as the issues at stake here are concerned. All Professor Soyinka had to do was to

call for a copy of the COMPASS Newspaper interview that I referenced in my article to confirm what

Babangida said or did not say. Remi Oyeyemi did not make anything up. The basis of my article was

the IBB interview which portrayed the Professor in a less than candid manner. All that was needed was

that the revered Professor should clear the air. Babangida has made his own revelation for whatever

reasons known to him, it is now up to Professor Soyinka to tell the world any yet unknown aspects of

the happenstance that IBB might have mischievously withheld and to sue IBB if he so desires. As to

“the earth-shaking details of the tea session,” it is one’s hope that the Professor would not wait until

another revealing interview comes out before he scrambles to scribble another tenuous defence of his

acts of omissions and or commissions.

Between Remi Oyeyemi and Wole Soyinka, only one person has worked for Babangida in the past and

that person is NOT Remi Oyeyemi. Thus for those readers who are quick to conclude that this criticism

of Uncle Kongi is as a result of my fondness of Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida I am recommending the

following past articles by Remi Oyeyemi to them – QUESTIONS IBB MUST ANSWER published on July

12, 2002; A TALE OF TWO TRAITORS published on December 27, 2002 and FALAE’S IBB GAMBIT

published on August 25, 2003 all of them on www.nigeriaworld.com. I have been involved in the media

either directly or indirectly for about 25 years now. I do not need any publicity stunt. And this is not

one either.

Hopefully by now, the highly esteemed Professor would have discovered that I, REMI OYEYEMI, am not

“faceless.” This he would have found out if he did a better home work in the media and political circles

that he was quick to flagrantly flaunt before rushing his rejoinder for publication. It is hoped the

esteemed Professor would cease throwing around words like “home work” until he is able to lead by a

personal example and spare the rest of us sanctimonious preachments. Regardless, I still maintain

that everyone has the right to drink tea, “something stronger” or whatever with whomever he so

chooses and can politically support whoever catches his or her fancy. But there is no reason to be

defensive and camouflage actualities from those who expect candour and openness from us. Simplicita.
And this is my final word on this issue.


Read more…
I won’t allow my daughter do what I did with Ojukwu
By Alvan Ewuzie[alvanatsun@yahoo.com]

Bianca Ojukwu exudes beauty.
And it is not beauty without brain. To say that she is intelligent is to state the obvious. It only takes a brief interaction to unravel the bundle of giftedness masking under the rather innocent smiles and affectionate disposition of this lawyer who seems to relish in accomplishing unconventional things. She made waves as a beauty queen in 1988 and capped it up with marrying a man old enough to be her father. All that is history given that Bianca has made an outstanding success of a relationship everyone thought was doomed to fail, a situation not helped by stiff family opposition.

Over two decades after, Bianca’s marriage to Dim Odumegwu Ojukwu has turned out the longest relationship the Ikemba ever had with any woman. That’s another unconventional success. In this interaction she gives the recipe for successful marriage and makes an unusual foray into the enigma called Ojukwu.

Then the big irony: Bianca wont let her daughter do what she did with Ojukwu. It is an interesting discussion. Excerpts:

How long have you been married to Dim Odumegwu Ojukwu

We have been into a relationship since 1989 but we got married formally on November 12, 1994. We have been together for over 20 years because we have been living together since 1989.

How old were you and how old was he at the time.

Well I was 22 while he was in his mid 50s

People considered you too young for him at that time. How did you feel then.

Its not your conventional relationship. Looking back now I certainly realise that I was very young at that time but it didn’t seem to matter because we had so much in common and we had good communication. The gap was not there in our day-to-day interactions. People found the relationship a bizarre one because of the age difference but it is only now when I look back, now that I have children of my own that I realise that it was rather unusual.

You were so much in love at the time that you didn’t notice any disparity in your ages.

I don’t know whether I would classify it as being in love. I just know that the difference tended to melt away when compared to the common grounds that we had. We had a similar background and we had so much to talk about. We had common interests and we just did a lot of things together. We went to see plays at the theatre, we went on vacations and there was just no disparity in our interaction. I didn’t feel it at the time.

How come you are feeling it now

No I don’t feel it now because we have got used to each other having been together for so long. I always say to him I am like the furniture in your house. We are too used to each other. I can complete his sentences and he can complete mine. Really I think at the end of the day that’s what is imperative in every relationship. You must be able to communicate. He understands me fully and he appreciates that mine has been a life of dedication to him. I know the travails he has been through and I appreciate that a man such as him needs somebody to step in and play the role of wife, sister and mother simultaneously and give him peace of mind in his day to day life.

Would you say therefore that you were psychologically prepared to be Ojukwu’s wife

I come from a political family. If that is being psychologically prepared well I am not the one to say so. But I think I had to shoulder a lot of responsibilities beyond what somebody of my age would reasonably be expected to go through. I had to learn in the process. I think I have done well because it requires diplomacy and the fact that sometimes you have to get out of your skin to mediate in conflicts that will generally arise around a man of his stature. It’s been quite challenging but I thank God that I have been able to navigate the terrain.

Has it ever occurred to you that people never gave this marriage a chance, yet it has lasted this long. How does that make you feel

I feel blessed. I have known friends in more conventional marriages, who break up, remarry and break up again in this space of time and I am still here. I thank God for his grace because nobody gave this thing a chance of survival. In all honesty I was really young at that time and I did believe that I could handle it. Now when I look back I wonder how I did it. That was not a situation your average 22-year-old could handle. Normally the disparity ought to make the interests different. But the truth is that I didn’t miss those things the average 22-year old would want, like going to parties, clubs and the like. Those were not my interest. Though people have always said that I am very old fashioned and I didn’t have those things that propel people of my age. I wanted a stable marriage. I wanted to live with a man that I had a lot in common with and a man that I could spend the rest of my life with. Having said that the truth is that it requires a lot of sacrifice, commitment and hard work to be able to make it work.

Was it that you had to grow up to him or he had to come down to you? How was the mix

No question about that, I had to grow up to him. I had to learn to interact with people who were a lot older than I was. Generally from the time I was 22 people who were coming to our various homes were people of his age. They were his friends and by extension they have become my friends too. I give God the glory. He has some of the most dedicated, committed and loyal friends who are dedicated to him and to his struggle. I feel privileged to have met those categories of people. I consider them as family. So I had to grow up to his life.

You were not scared by that calibre of people

Don’t forget that I am the daughter of a former governor. My father was the Governor of old Anambra S tate, now consisting of Enugu and parts of Ebonyi. So I was certainly not intimidated because we had such regular high calibre people visiting us. There were Presidents, ex-presidents, Ambassadors, governors were frequent visitors. I was not intimidated in the least. It was just a progression. Just that the same calibre of people were now visiting in another house. The routine was basically the same, just a little bit accentuated.

Let’s talk about Ojukwu. What kind of a man is he?

I think you are in a better position. Having spent the better part of two hours with him today, I think you are probably in a better position to do that. As you can see he is a very complex man, very complex. He can be like a volcano about to erupt this minute and the next he is like a kitten. His persona switches so rapidly that it is really quite hard to pin him down, to paint a complete picture of the man. There would always be that mystery. He is kind, caring and, as you have witnessed, he is a very stubborn man. A lot of the time he gets impatient and most people find that rather intimidating. But he can be very meek. One just have to find that meeting ground of interacting with him. Once you can do that then you are on safe ground. But he can be quite difficult to decode.

Obviously he loves you and says it to anyone who cares to listen. What are the things he does differently to you that also gives you the impression that he really does love you

I think it is the absolute trust that he has in me, the faith. I think every man is looking for a replacement for his mother. That’s one thing I have learnt. In life every man looks for that woman who would not just be his wife but his mother, whose paramount objective is to ensure that he can be the best man he is meant to be. I wouldn’t say that he loves me in an irrational way. Perhaps in me he has been able to find that combination of wife and mother. The mother element is very important because its only your mother that you would trust so absolutely to be able to deliver the best judgments and to be able to pull you back when they think you are doing something wrong. It is just to have absolute trust in your judgment and go to bed with both eyes closed. A lot of people don’t have that in their families. A lot of men find that their wives tend to be quite demanding and impatient and the men then reflect that in their attitude. But I think a woman cannot get the best out of any man by nagging him or making him feel bad and less of a man. But if you let him be a man then you get the best out of him. That’s what has helped this marriage to stay the way it is today.

You are a lawyer but you seem to be averse to politics even when you grew in a political home so to say

Well, I have seen quite a lot in my life with Ikemba and I have seen that you need to develop very tough skin to go into politics and unfortunately that’s something I am yet to develop. Until Nigeria offers an opportunity for one to be a decent politician without having to sell their soul I will continue to be averse to politics. I have hope that we will get to that stage soon because the Nigerian people are no longer willing to just sit back and watch and accept whatever is rammed down their throat. The recent election in Anambra is a pointer to that.

I understand that one or two political offers had come your way. You don’t want them or you just prefer being Ikemba’s wife.

Being Ikemba’s wife is a job on its own. These are issues that are being constantly discussed. Right now my prerogative is my husband and my family. I have a very young family. I don’t want a situation that would have my attention divided. I would like to help determine the path that my children would take. I would like to be instrumental to raising and shaping their lives. I am not saying that I cannot do that and serve the people at the same time. These were offers that were made even before the elections but I just do not feel that the time was ripe for it.

Your relationship with Ikemba is the longest he has had with any woman. Does that make you feel special

[long laughter] it must be one of two things. Its either that I am made of a sponge like material that I can absorb or that I am made of a shell like object, like a turtle back and I have found a way of making things work. Some times you are lucky in life. You just come across somebody that God says this is the person that you will stay with for the rest of your life and you just have to work at maintaining that relationship. He is working and I am working too and we both appreciate the fact that we need each other and that we both need to be as committed as we can for the relationship to work. That’s what we are doing, building on it everyday. That’s just the key. It does not make me feel special. Its not like being in Las Vegas everyday. But the high points are always more than the low points. I think if you can get 70 percent you have done very well.

How do you relate with his other grown up children and perhaps if there are other living wives.

[laughs] I like the way you put it, living wives. The fact is that at the time I met him he was a bachelor. He was not living or married to anybody at that time and that’s probably why we were able to go through a Roman Catholic wedding. We had our wedding in a Roman Catholic Church and that would have been impossible if he were designated a married man, otherwise he would have been a bigamist. I am just making the point that I met him as a bachelor. Of course he had been in a lot of other relationships but I have not had the opportunity of interacting with those people that he had had relationships with in the past.

What about his children

Oh yes. You know he has three children that are older than I am. We get on quite well. Most of the children don’t live here. They live abroad. My marriage to their father is not anything new because they live in societies where such things are not abnormal as such. They know their limits. We hold family meetings and things like that. Some times issues come up that we don’t all agree upon. At such times Ikemba steps in and sorts things out, that’s normal but generally we get on well. So far its been quite cordial and when they come on vacation they stay here and I am glad to tell you that they all have their rooms here. I have tried to make sure that we are one united family.

What I deduce from the foregoing is that you are Ojukwu’s only legitimate wife

That’s correct. If there is any body else who can present a wedding picture, a marriage certificate in the church then I am willing to defer to that person. However, we live in Africa and the church format is not the only acceptable mode. There is the traditional mode. In my own case I did not start with the traditional marriage because my parents were initially opposed to the marriage. I only went through the traditional marriage after the birth of my children. My children were present at the event. Any woman who has been married in the traditional mode is also an acceptable wife. The only time both modes come into conflict is when there is a legal contention. That’s why I am making it clear that he went through both processes with me.

You mean you are not aware of any other women who went through those processes with him.

I am not aware of any body that went through a church wedding with him. You know the Roman Catholic Church is very strict in that respect. If they had any such information they would not have done the wedding. No catholic priest would wed you if he considers you a bigamist. They wed you strictly on the basis that you are a single man.

Is he still the romantic man you met in 1989

Oh my. I think romance runs in his veins. He will never change. I am the one who is not romantic. I am very practical. But he is very poetic. By virtue of his education and interactions in life Ojukwu was raised as an aristocrat so he tends to focus more on the classics, the arts, literature and so on. When you look at him in that light you find that he cannot but be romantic. In everything he does, it comes through. Its part of his everyday life. Even now when he is not as strong as he used to be, he would still come to open doors for me to get into the car. He would ensure I am served a drink before him and things like that. He is a typical gentle man. Without a doubt if Ikemba is nothing, else he is a perfect gentleman.

Why did you say you won’t allow him to present himself again for an elective post

I think he has done his bit. There comes a time in every man’s life when you just need to find the nearest beach, find a deck chair, sit by the ocean and reflect. I think he is at that stage in his life. He has done nothing but live and breathe the Igbo course. Sometimes he would hear of some injustice somewhere and he would stay awake all night, trying to find how it can be redressed. I remember the situation of the Apo six. He would wake up at night and say to me ‘whats happening, have these people been found, what are you gleaning from the media. Any time an Igboman suffers any form of injustice, it makes his blood boil, even in situations when he feels helpless. At such times I simply pray to God that he does not have a blood condition because he see him so agitated. At such times, I also tell him to stop knocking his head against the brick wall. I think he has sacrificed everything including his family. There are things he ought to have done but didn’t have the time to do because of his struggles. Now, I think that whatever time he has left should be used for his family, to nurture the family and let other people carry on from where he left off.

You are the closest person to him and I want to know whether people will ever get to read his memoirs

Like you and everybody else I also keep my fingers crossed. But I can tell you that he has been writing but slowly though. Some times he wakes up, remembers an incident and then writes. One thing I know is that he is not writing the account in sequence, he puts down incidents as he remembers. At the moment, there is a group currently showing very strong interest in getting him to complete and publish the memoirs. But I do not know how soon that will be. And it is something that we all really need to see, to know what really happened or more importantly how his mind was working at the time, his fears, anxieties and aspirations, what he wanted to achieve and why he took some of the decisions he took. A lot of people still do not have a real grasp of those things and we need to get into the innermost recesses of his mind to know them.

But is he really working on it

Yes, I know for a fact that he is working on it but at a snail speed.

You still look trim and fit, how do you manage to keep this fit.

Do you know what it takes to run this house, run my NGO, run my law chambers? There are so many things I am doing that some times I don’t even have time for lunch. I think I am overworked. I don’t think it has to do with any beauty routine. The work is enough to keep me trim. We have a swimming pool that I only use when my kids come on holiday and I join them there occasionally. I have a gym which I rarely use. But when I get the opportunity I walk around the compound for health purposes but strictly speaking, I don’t have a beauty routine.

You said your parents were opposed to the marriage but what we know is that it was your late father who was opposed to it.

I think it will be unfair to say that it was just my father that was opposed. My mother had her reservations also, just that she had a different style of showing it. Mothers being what they are, they would hardly cast their daughter adrift completely no matter the circumstance. They don’t want to come out openly and deny or lambaste you. Mothers always try to nurture. But my father was left with the tag of being the chief opponent of the marriage. My mother had her reservations and to tell you the truth, as a mother I would do the same thing.

Right now I am the proud mother of a 12 year old daughter. Even if she was 25 or 30 and comes to tell me that she wants to marry a man twice her age, I would still refuse. Yes I know your next question, yes I did it but that does not make it the usual pattern. Its not conventional and it can only be handled by somebody who is mature and wise beyond their years. And I tell that I support my father’s action. He did the best thing any parent would do for his child. It would have been disappointing if he gave his support without any form of resistance. Basically he did the right thing. My mother had her reservations too, just that my father's own was more prominent because he was more domineering. But the truth is that it was his resistance that has largely helped to make this marriage successful.

Really

Yes. Because my husband then had to be very careful. He knew that if he didn’t treat me right and things didn’t go too well, he would have my father to contend with. And my father also gave me a crucial advise which I have always cherished. You know we were living in Lagos and my father told me that if I ever had plans of raising kids with my husband I must ensure that we come back to settle in the east. My father had this very strong sense of identity of where he comes from which was why he insisted that my kids be born and raised here in the east. It was his advice and one that I would ever treasure and it was the best decision I ever took.

When did you eventually come back to live in Enugu

After our wedding we moved to Abuja, After a few years we now came to live in Enugu.

Do you agree with people who say that the Igbos have neglected Ojukwu

It was said that the Igbos neglected Zik, Okpara and Akanu Ibiam. But before you can substantite that statement you have to look at Ndigbo as a people. We are republican in nature. So its hard to determine the level of love, adulation and respect the Igbos give to their leaders. But in all fairness I think that Ojukwu has been luckier than most Igbo leaders. I have been with him to so many parts of Igbo land and I am moved to tears by the kind of reception he is accorded. I have seen a whole market dismantled just to get his car to pass in the tick of massive traffic. I saw youths dismantle a market just for his car to pass. When you go with him to a place like Aba, the reception is better seen than described. So I think the Igbos love him tremendously and they have shown it to him.

Take the Anambra election for example, the other candidates had so much money and support from the centre. But Peter Obi had virtually nothing, he was like the under dog. Yes he was governor but don’t forget that he no member of his party in the state House of Assembly. But he had one man and this man had only five words to say; This is my last wish. How many other people could do that and get the kind of response Ojukwu got. People came back from all parts of the world in response to that call, though some of them were disentranchised and so could not vote. They have shown him love. They love him and see him as their treasure. Of course if there is any one that can come up boldly to berate him in the newspaper, it would be an Igbo man but they still love so much. As for neglect, well do not forget that his father was the first millionaire to come from Igboland and the first African to enter United Kingdom without a visa, yet his son is such a simple man.

Ojukwu can live in a card room box. Even if it an old, haggard looking 504 car Ojukwu would enter and be driven to his destination. That simplicity is the greatest bond between him and Peter Obi. Peter would come here to visit us like any other Person, yet people who are not even governors would come with a convoy of seven cars. He is very modest and frugal man. You would see him queue up at the airport. If you permit him he would travel on the economy class. Both of them are alike because they consider themselves first and foremost as servants of the people. They do not brazenly display the paraphernalia of power. Peter Obi certainly does not do that. His popularity with the populace is phenomenal. He may not have that with the elite who thinks that he should defer to them but he defers more to the masses. In that light Peter Obi and Ojukwu are very much the same.

If you go to Peter Obi’s house he would refuse to serve you champagne. I think the highest he would probably give you is red wine or stout. If you ask him he would tell you that he knows the cost of champagne because he trades in such commodities and knows their astronomical cost and thus considers it rather criminal to drink such stuff randomly. He says people can do that in their houses if they wished but he would do no such thing in his own house. His style is not usual and he is a very principled man. Many people do not like the fact that he is very frugal administrator. He is a hands on person who could step in and do things himself. If you visit him he will be serving you by himself in spite of the retinue of staff. He is unassuming and his people like it. You cannot believe his level of simplicity.

That’s the bond between him and Ojukwu. Do you know that Ojukwu never handles money. As I talk to you he probably does not know the colour of one thousand naira note. People administer those things for him. Ojukwu is so contented with whatever he has. As long as there is water to drink he is fine. You know before we moved to this place, we were living in a very small house and he was happy there. To a very large extent he built this new house because of me. I was the one who told him to get a bigger place and he would say no matter how big the hose is you only get to stay in one room and just one bed eventually.

I tell you for two years this house was completed and furnished yet Ojukwu did not move into it. He considered it too big. I actually tricked him into moving here on the night of a Good Friday. I just told him to get into the car for an outing and that was how I brought him here having moved some things to this place earlier. We left the old furniture in the former house. He was raised in affluence but he has little or no regard for anything that connotes wealth. I think such people are very rare to find, people who are willing to divest themselves of the paraphernalia of wealth and power. Somebody once said that it a great man to be little. I never really understood the significance of that statement until I came to live with Ojukwu. If Iwere asked to chose three words that would define him by way of an epitaph I cant do batter than saying that he was a simple man
Read more…
James Cameron did it to James Cameron.Cameron's unstoppable Avatar hit $1.29 billion at the international box office, Fox said today, passing Cameron's Titanic mark of $1.24 billion to set the new record. By Monday, the studio estimates, Avatar will top Titanic's worldwide gross of $1.848 billion to become Earth's biggest money-maker of all-time.And, no, the film is not stopping there.Within a week to a week-and-a-half, Fox guestimated, the 3D- and IMAX-powered Avatar should swipeTitanic's last remaining major record: all-time domestic champ.Avatar, which grossed $36 million domestically Friday-Sunday, and, oh, by the way, led the box office for a sixth straight weekend, is now at $552.8 million on that ledger. On Saturday, it blew past The Dark Knight for second place on the domestic list. Titanic's once-believed unbeatable $600.8 million will be the next to go.Rose and Jack, we hardly knew ye."Milestones like this are great," calm and composed Fox exec Chris Aronson said today. "It's part of an amazing ride the film has taken us on. [But] this film is still just captivating audieces on global basis."So, to answer the question, you celebrate becoming the world's No. 1 film after you're finished being the world's No. 1 film.Away from China !Audiences love Avatar. The Golden Globes love Avatar. Chinese mucky-mucks...that's another story.Officials behind the Great Wall are yanking James Cameron's fantasy flick to make way for a biopic of favorite son Confucius.And no, it's not in eye-popping 3-D. But it does have Chow Yun-Fat.China's state-run movie distributor, China Film Group, is responsible for the switcheroo, according to Hong Kong's Apple Daily (via the Los Angeles Times), and finalized its decision after propaganda officials complained that Avatar, playing in 1,628 Chinese theaters, was taking away too much market share from homegrown flicks and bringing unwanted attention to the communist country's issue of forced evictions.Chinese people have been relocated by the millions to make room for government projects. In Avatar, humans try to displace an alien race to mine a precious element.Avatar has been playing in China for just two weeks and has banked $73.2 million—making it the top-grossing film in the nation's history.Which, in Avatar's case, may take a while.Avatar Lords Over Rings, Now No. 2 All TimeLooks like James Cameron is the King of Middle Earth, too.With $1.14 billion worldwide and counting, Avatar has now overtaken the $1.1 billion raked in by 2003's The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King to become the second-highest-grossing film in history.In fact, Avatar is going so strong that what once seemed an out-of-this-world impossibility now seems within the realm of (virtual) reality. If the 20th Century Fox movie, which screens in both 2-D and 3-D formats, keeps up its current pace, it could catch the $1.8 billion in global ticket sales tallied by the Oscar-winning filmmaker's own Titanic.It that wasn't enough (and it never is in Tinseltown), Fox's FX cable network has reportedly paid upward of $25 million for the TV rights to Avatar, which will premiere in 2012.And that makes Cameron's blue folk even more green.Some more notes on the box-office weekend:• The $25 million Legion (second place, $18.2 million) did well for a $25 million angel-action movie.• The $31 million Extraordinary Measures (seventh place, $7 million) did poorly for a $31 million Brendan Fraser and Harrison Ford movie.• The $48 million The Tooth Fairy (fourth place, $14.5 million) did better than Extraordinary Measures, but not much better.• Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel (eighth place, $6.5 million) topped $200 million domestically; It's Complicated (ninth place, $6.2 million) moved in on $100 million.• Sandra Bullock's The Blind Side ($4.5 million) departed the Top 10 after nine long weeks, and a super $234 million run.• Leap Year ($3 million; $23 million overall) got bounced from the Top 10 after two short weekends.Here's a rundown of the weekend's top-grossing films, per estimates compiled by Exhibitor Relations:Avatar, $36 millionLegion, $18.2 millionThe Book of Eli, $17 millionThe Tooth Fairy, $14.5 millionThe Lovely Bones, $8.8 millionSherlock Holmes, $7.1 millionExtraordinary Measures, $7 millionAlvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel, $6.5 millionIt's Complicated, $6.2 millionThe Spy Next Door, $4.8 million(Originally published on Jan. 24, 2010, at 9:18 a.m. PT)
Read more…

Blog Topics by Tags

  • in (506)
  • to (479)
  • of (339)
  • ! (213)
  • as (166)
  • is (157)
  • a (156)

Monthly Archives